In Defense of Actors
In the past few months
I’ve found myself in the acquaintance of a great many non-actors. Actually, non-entertainment
industry…ers but, well, interestingly, acting seems to be the area where are
they have most pre conceived notions.
In fact, acting seems to
be the area where most people, industry (a term for those in the
entertainment business) or not seem to have the greatest pre conceived notions
about the entertainment business. A, to be honest, rather shocking experience
I’ve had post Twilight: The Unauthorized
Musical Parody is of walking into a room of industry members and getting a
completely different response depending on whether I’m introduced first as an
actor or a writer. If introduced as a writer I am immediately assumed to be
intelligent, savvy, and generally on an equal par with those in the room. If
introduced as an actor I am dumb, naïve, unknowledgeable about business in any
way, and nothing more than a “pretty girl.”
A disclaimer here – this
is certainly not ALWAYS the case. I have many wonderful friends, both industry
and not for whom this couldn’t be further from the truth. But sadly, in the
past nine months especially, I have come to experience this more and more when
I meet new people. And I felt it was time to address it.
A note: The “actor” I am
using as a paradigm here is, what I consider to be, a typical New York working
actor – someone who is, or is on the way to being successful in their field. In
general, if you’re acting, you’re an actor – so I think this should be the
litmus test for the issues below. I will occasionally address the “green”
actor, or LA actor – I grew up in LA, and made my acting debut at five, so,
while I mainly live and work in NYC now, I feel more than qualified to comment
on the LA demographic – and yes, I think there is a difference to be taken into
account.
These are the stereotypes
I hear most commonly perpetuated:
In reality, I think
actors are some of the most well-adjusted, self-knowledgeable people on the
planet. What do you think we do in acting school? Aside from technically
developing our “instrument” (our bodies, and voices,) acting class is basically
one giant psychology course – intensely studying both yourself, and the rest of
the world. No, I didn’t say therapy session, though there is often crying
involved. I said psychology course. Notice how the number one major (for those
actors who choose to study something else in college,) secondary major, or
minor for actors in college is psychology. Heck, even if you do think of it as
therapy – it’s therapy where the patient comes out the other side incredibly
self aware, and empathetic. Not committed to an institution.
One thing you can never
really say about actors is that we’re repressed. We all have issues, but actors
generally know what they are, and have good ways of dealing with them. Actors
cry, we laugh, we get angry, because at the end of the day our job description
– the thing we get paid money to do, is to get onstage, or in front of a camera
and experience those things for YOU. The audience. Our job is to get you to
experience YOUR sadness, YOUR joy, YOUR anger. And we can’t do that without
being in touch with our own. We have to get up in front of hundreds, if not
thousands of people, and just BE. Let people look at us. Become vulnerable.
Show those things to strangers that they may not be comfortable even showing to
themselves. If we weren’t well adjusted, we’d be locked away.
So in order to do that
onstage, we have to be comfortable with ourselves in real life. That means we
often experience life in big ways. We may be that friend who always laughs
loudest at a funny movie, or lets others see us cry when we’re upset. It
doesn’t mean we’re a “drama queen,” and it certainly doesn’t mean we’re faking
emotion. It means we’re comfortable being in touch with it. And yeah, that can
be off putting. I wouldn’t want to be a non-actor at an actor’s party. But think
about what we have to do every day. We have to confront our own pain in the
face – in rehearsal, in front of strangers, for some even in the national, or
world spotlight. Yes, sometimes we may need some hand holding in rehearsal. We
may need you to be sensitive of our feelings. Because that’s what we’re being
asked to do – FEEL all day long. Think about it.
I think there's a general assumption that being emotional and being intelligent are mutually exclusive. Either you're ruled by your heart, or your head. Since actors are associated with being emotional the same way, say lawyers are associated with being intellectual (and if we were having this same discussion about breaking down lawyer stereotypes we would be making the case for them not just being thinking heads. Seriously - in the musical "Legally Blonde" there's a lyric that goes: "Don't lawyers feel love too? Even if they do...") Actors are not unthinking wells of emotion. And we couldn't act if we were. We're in touch with our emotions, we're comfortable with them, but we're not ruled by them. We craft them. We're analytically emotional. Usually the first week at least of rehearsal is dedicated to what we call "text analysis" - literally intellectually analyzing the text and making conscious choices about what the character is feeling, and doing, and what we need to do to bring that across. It requires a great deal of empathy, yes, but also intelligence.
I think there's a general assumption that being emotional and being intelligent are mutually exclusive. Either you're ruled by your heart, or your head. Since actors are associated with being emotional the same way, say lawyers are associated with being intellectual (and if we were having this same discussion about breaking down lawyer stereotypes we would be making the case for them not just being thinking heads. Seriously - in the musical "Legally Blonde" there's a lyric that goes: "Don't lawyers feel love too? Even if they do...") Actors are not unthinking wells of emotion. And we couldn't act if we were. We're in touch with our emotions, we're comfortable with them, but we're not ruled by them. We craft them. We're analytically emotional. Usually the first week at least of rehearsal is dedicated to what we call "text analysis" - literally intellectually analyzing the text and making conscious choices about what the character is feeling, and doing, and what we need to do to bring that across. It requires a great deal of empathy, yes, but also intelligence.
Regarding the
psychological issues – no way. I don’t think you can have deep psychological
issues and be a healthy actor. That’s not to say you can’t be deeply
emotionally scarred, and severely traumatized. Perhaps those people who have
experienced something incredibly painful and emotional are more in tune with
it, and have a need to explore it. But there are many other people in other
professions who have experienced similar things, and deal with it in different
ways.
Yeah, sometimes we can
create drama. But so can everyone. Theater drama can’t be any worse than office
drama. And most of the time things are rather calm in our real lives. I mean we
have enough drama onstage. Getting all that drama out onstage sometimes means
that our personal lives are far more calm, peaceful, and well adjusted then the
average person. I said sometimes…
Actors are vain, and obsessed
with their looks.
Here’s the thing. I admit
- if you invite me over for a party I will totally be that prat who doesn’t
partake in dessert. But it’s not because I’m totally obsessed with being “hot,”
it’s because I care more about succeeding in my career then getting to do
everything my friends do. Believe me, I love chocolate. My mom (among her many
other talents) is a gourmet cook. I make a mean cardamom coconut dark chocolate
cupcake. But that’s only happening on VERY special occasions. Because the harsh
truth of the matter is – if you’re an actor, you’re judged every day on how you
look. It’s just a fact of life. And I don’t mean that everyone has to be skinny
– I have a friend who played Tracy Turnblad in Hairspray and had to really work to maintain, and even gain
weight for the role. In general, I do think the entertainment industry has
gotten slightly better with regards to representing different kinds of bodies,
and beauty in general, but the fact of the matter is, if you don’t look a
certain way, you don’t work, and that usually means being thin, and really fit.
But that doesn’t come from the actors – that comes from everyone around us.
Agents, casting directors, directors, producers, heck, even corporate sponsors.
The fact is, being an actor is like being in advertizing, only the product
being sold is – YOU. If you watch Mad Men
think of all those meetings where they talk about redesigning an ad, adjusting
a product, using a different color background, going with a different “style.”
Yup. That’s you. Everything from your hair color and cut, to your weight, to
the clothes and make-up you wear affect your ability to be hired. At several
theater conservatories, on the first day of senior year guys are told to gain
thirty pounds of muscle, and girls are told to loose thirty pounds before the
senior showcase.
Sure, there are actors
who truly think they’re “all that” - but that’s a human problem, not an actor problem. Most
actors are concerned about their looks to the degree that it’s just something
they have to maintain for their job.
This is where I have to
offer a disclaimer. I think this issue is one of the big differences between NY
and LA actors. Again, I’m making a generalization, but hear me out. In NY, most
of the acting jobs available are theater related. And most of those are in the
musical theater category. To be onstage, you MUST have some degree of talent.
You just have to. You are up there eight times a week, and you have to be good.
This is even more pronounced in musical theater. Sure, people get cast because
of how they look, but at the end of the day you have to be able to sing and
dance well, and there’s no getting around it. In LA, most of the work is TV and
film related, where it is possible to get a decent performance out of someone
with no skills whatsoever thanks to the wonders of editing, and retakes. I don’t
consider these people serious actors, but the fact remains that serious actors
are going to have to compete with them for jobs – in which case getting cast
will COMPLETELY depend on how they look. Imagine if to get a job as a teacher,
or a lawyer, or a doctor your looks were taken into account, sometimes ahead of
your qualifications. Yeah. In general I would say this makes most actors, at least
somewhat insecure about their looks. Not vain. There’s a reason we take
so long to get ready for an audition. And it’s not because we like to. We’d far
rather be able to go to an audition with no makeup, wearing sweats, and get to
be judged purely on our technical abilities. Not the way we look.
Actors are dumb
Actors are not dumb. Non-actors
who want to be famous frequently are. I feel like this stereotype comes from
the fact that actors are almost always hired to fill a pre prescribed role.
Often they’re not a creator on a project. They audition, are hired, and then
are told what to do. Therefore they get a reputation as someone who needs to be
held by the hand, ordered around, and are basically on par with a trained
puppy. That’s a difficulty of the situation. Not our intelligence level.
In fact, unless you’re
dealing with a really great director, our opinion is often of no importance.
The show has already been created by the time we come on board, and if there’s
something that needs to be changed, well, the creative team already has a
rapport, and a history with the show and, since most actors are not writers or
directors, their opinion is more apt to slow down the process. Not to mention
the fact that there is typically ONE writer, ONE director, ONE composer, and
DOZENS of actors. Theater is not a democracy. If it were, no show would ever
open.
That means actors often
can’t be outright smart. Sometimes, we have to be subtle.
Lets take into account,
for example, those shows every actor has been a part of where one, or often,
several members of the production team don’t know what they’re doing. I’ve had
directors who refuse to set blocking, don’t show up to rehearsal, or down right
haven’t even read the script. (MAJOR note: I’m talking about obvious,
indisputable incompetence. This is not to be taken as an axiom that whenever
you don’t like a director, you should assume they’re bad and do your own thing.
That’s being an incompetent actor.) In those cases the actors are directing
themselves. That takes mad skills, and great intelligence to pull off.
A potential grey area
here are “green” actors. “Green” actors are actors who do not have much
experience in the business. Typically they are fresh out of school and, though
they may be talented, don’t really know the ins and outs of the business yet.
In the most stereotypical sense, these are the girls who show up for a shady
casting session in some guy’s living room where there’s nothing but a couch and
a video camera, not realizing that something might be off. Yes, at one time we
were all green. We may not have all been naïve (especially about a casting call
in a shady apartment), but we were all innocent when we started – and that’s
true of anyone starting out in any profession. The bottom line is: innocent
does NOT equal stupid. If it did, you'd have to say most people under the age of fourteen
are stupid. And (while some may claim they are,) I don’t believe it’s true. We
all learn the ropes sooner or later. If we were stupid, we never would.
Actors know how to save
and invest money. Often they start a retirement fund well before their non-actor
peers. They know how to live frugally (one of my friends joked after the
economy crashed that actors would be the only ones to make it through because
they were the only demographic with true survival skills.) They are emotionally
generous, and know that there are more important things in life than financial
success. They read. They frequent libraries. They are culturally and
artistically educated, and savvy, and have probably seen more art than any
other population demographic (between research for a role, or audition, going
to see their friend’s work, exploring the underground art scene, or simply
wanting to feed themselves artistically they probably come the closest to seeing
every theatrical production in a given area, not to mention films, art
exhibits, dance shows and concerts.) In their heads they hold some of the
greatest writing of all human existence, and more music then any ipod. They
understand contractual negotiations. They know when to share a kernel of
wisdom, and when to keep silent. They can convincingly play the most
intelligent people in the world, not to mention convincingly pretend to have
the most intellectual jobs – understanding the jargon, and basic operating
procedures of lawyers, doctors, scientists, and presidents. To be a true actor
you must be knowledgeable about, literally, everything.
You can not be a true
actor without being intelligent.
Except for some very talented,
successful, well-known actors, most actors are “starving artists” and need to
grow up all ready and get a real job.
I’ll make this short and
sweet. There are a lot of non-famous actors who are very much working actors.
Regional theater, tours, small roles in TV and film – out of these careers can
be made. Yes, there are starving artists. Jonathan Larson was one. Katy Perry,
Jim Carrey, and many, many others were too. Some wait decades for their big
break. Some, like Larsen never make it in their lifetime. But thank God they stuck
it out!
Just because our culture
doesn’t support the arts the way it ideally should, doesn’t mean that we should
consider a career in the arts a pipe dream. Can you imagine if every struggling
artist just gave up? The world would be a miserable place. And we’d have a lot
of depressed businessmen. It IS possible to have a career in the arts. It’s not
always possible to be Angelina Jolie.
Seriously, how hard can it be?
Practically anyone could do it.
You try it. Seriously. Go
take an acting class. Go audition for a local theater. Oh, and be really good.
Statistically it is more
competitive to get into Clown College then to get into Harvard. Many theatrical
conservatories have classes of about thirty students. TOTAL. I hold a degree
with high honors from New York University. In drama. I still study, and train
daily. I’ve also had over twenty years of practical experience on stage, and in
front of a camera. I’m not unusual. All professional actors have trained to be
able to do what they do. I truly
think everyone has some artistic capacity. But lets just say it’s called a craft
for a reason.
OMG! I love my cast! They’re
totally like my family! I don’t know what I’m going to do if I don’t see them
everyday! OMG!
Yup. A lot of times it’s
true. Deep in your gut, no joke, true. And I know – it’s easy to poke fun at
from the outside.
In the best
circumstances, casts bond. It’s necessary. And yes, it can happen insanely
fast. And it has to. That doesn’t always make it shallow or insincere.
Performing is dangerous – physically and emotionally. I will be called upon to
perform stage combat, fall in love, mourn, and celebrate with people I met two
hours ago in a rehearsal room. Part of what we are trained to do as actors is
to keep each other safe. Acting is reacting – and we are constantly aware of
what’s going on with our acting partners. Actors also tend to be sensitively
aware of other people. We know when someone’s not ok. Our partners allow us to
be emotionally raw – not only without judgment, but with support and
encouragement. Often that spills over into us sharing things about our personal
life off stage.
This certainly doesn’t
mean we always fall in love with our onstage love interest – that would be as
ridiculous as saying we always despise our onstage nemesis. In fact, I know I
personally am often closer with my onstage rival in real life. Playing that
kind of relationship sometimes takes MORE trust.
A note regarding my comment
about acting being physically dangerous. I would NEVER do anything truly
dangerous onstage. I believe in safety no matter what. Never the less, I have
been “drowned,” killed, and seriously assaulted onstage. And it takes a great
deal of trust to be able to execute such things safely. Especially eight times
a week.
Cast members are also all
learning together. We may be trained actors, but usually we are all
learning these lines, chords, and steps together. We struggle, and succeed
together. We often spend more time together then we do with our families. We
see each other every single day during the run of a show – and during
rehearsals we are stuck with each other all day long. For weeks. Even months. Sometimes in a new town, state, country or even continent. Either we’re going to hate each other, or come to deeply care for, and rely on
each other.
And - this is getting
into tricky territory – it is true that many artists come from difficult, or
sometimes non existent family situations (see comments on emotional trauma
above.) Cast members really can become family. Yes, of course it’s often the
case that cast members become close on a show, only to never see each other
again, or to only reconnect when they happen to be cast together again. But I
don’t believe that in the moment cast bonding, whether it lasts or not is
insincere. Sometimes it’s just creating the bond of trust you need to
successfully do the show. Sometimes it’s a long-term connection. All I know is
that there are some actors I’ve worked with who have become my family in the
truest sense of the word. I consider them my brothers, sisters, aunts and
uncles. I call them in a crisis. We’ve shared life events. I’ve never had a
“showmance” (a romance that only lasts for the life of a show. Sometimes less…)
But I have found my adopted family in rehearsal rooms. Even people I bonded
with on shows who are not a daily part of my life retain that sense of trust
and connection – and I would love to reconnect and jump into another project
with them. Actor bonding may sound like fluff, but there’s nothing insincere,
or shallow about it.
I wanna be an actor ‘cause I
wanna be famous!
Lets just say, there are
a lot easier, and faster ways to become famous then becoming a serious actor.
No one suffers through being a starving artist purely to be famous.
And for anyone whose sole
goal IS being famous – I feel sorry for them. I have worked with famous actors.
I’ve experienced it by proxy. It’s far from fun. I liken it to this: If you’re
a judge, you go to work, put on your robes, and become a “Judge.” Then at the
end of the day you take them off and get to go home and be yourself. When you’re
famous – the “robe” never comes off. Remember the idea of actors being their
own product? When you’re famous – you’re a walking commodity. And you never get
to take off the mask. Yes, it’s wonderful to be respected and lauded for your
work. But being famous is another animal entirely. It can potentially come with
the job, yes. But it’s not the spoils. It’s the challenge to overcome.
The theatrical community is a
hotbed of moral depravity. Actors are sluts, and alcoholics. No child of mine
is going into the arts!
This has been a stereotype since the dawn of
theater. Yeah, there’s inappropriate behavior. AND highly moral behavior. Just
like everywhere. Going into the arts will not make you an immoral person. And
don’t use it as an excuse to keep your child out of the arts. Instead, help them
develop deep values that won’t be affected no matter where they go, or what
they do. Besides, if there IS immorality in the arts – don’t we need more
people of integrity to go into the field?
In conclusion….
Yes, there are
unintelligent actors, just like there are unintelligent – everythings! But I
beg you – in the future when dealing with actors, assume intelligence until
proven stupid. Not the other way around. Whether you’re in the industry, or
even just at a party where your waiter happens to be a struggling actor. Treat
them with respect. They are probably smarter, and hold more credentials then
many of the guests. They have taken up a noble crusade – and if it weren’t for
them, there would be no theater, film, or television. One of the tragic things
I’ve noticed, that so far has gone unmentioned, is that actors are the one
artistic demographic that will most likely never be in the position of being
able to give someone a job. Writers create projects that will employ entire
production teams, and casts of actors. Directors, producers, almost everyone
else can get you a job. But not an actor. Unless they’re well known, there’s no
reason to network with them. So they are often treated as insignificant. But
actors are creators too. One only has to spend five minutes in a rehearsal with
poorly cast actors to know that they carry every bit as much weight as a
writer, or director. We know what we’re doing. Trust us.